CNN recently did a story about how
Nevada is “dumping” their mental patients into San Francisco so that they will
not have to deal with them. Click here for the link. Overall, I believe that
this is a solid example of writing for broadcast journalism.
The popular saying goes, broadcast
journalism is written for “the ear, not the eye”. Kyung Lah, the reporter
breaking the story, speaks in a very conversational tone, and invites the
viewer to engage in the story. The feature piece is much more “friendly” than print
journalism, as the latter is usually more fact-oriented. In addition, the CNN
video takes a while to get to the main point of the story, while in print it
would come at the beginning.
The language is extremely dumbed
down, almost as if it is being told like a school report. The sentences are
short, to the point, and easy to say out loud. Lah makes the story seem very
important; despite it’s lack of physical relevancy (CNN is an internationally
broadcast news channel), the human-interest aspect of the story, as well as the
clever writing, makes it very relevant. There are also lots of visuals that aid
the story, and that only adds in clarifying the writing.
The Nevada “dumping” story was a
cleverly written CNN news story, and remains an excellent example of broadcast
journalism. The writing is much more conversational than print, and is told as
if the viewer is speaking to a close friend. While writing may be obviously
more noticeable in print journalism, writing “for the ear” remains an important
craft in it’s own right.
No comments:
Post a Comment